<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIG: Too Big to Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/</link>
	<description>Obstinately objective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Australian Banks Get A Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Banks Get A Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>[...] depositors were starting to worry about the safety of their savings. As I noted in an earlier post on AIG, when it comes to banking, if enough people think you have a problem, then you do have a problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] depositors were starting to worry about the safety of their savings. As I noted in an earlier post on AIG, when it comes to banking, if enough people think you have a problem, then you do have a problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>@AJ: very interesting! It seems that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28melt.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the NYT broke the story first&lt;/a&gt;, although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE48R3HQ20080928&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Goldmans are denying it&lt;/a&gt;. As you&#039;ve said elsewhere, where there&#039;s smoke there&#039;s fire!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AJ: very interesting! It seems that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28melt.html?_r=2&#038;ref=business&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin">the NYT broke the story first</a>, although <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE48R3HQ20080928">Goldmans are denying it</a>. As you&#8217;ve said elsewhere, where there&#8217;s smoke there&#8217;s fire!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>you may or may not have seen the report that Goldman was facing a 20bn balance sheet hole if AIG wasn&#039;t bailed out....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you may or may not have seen the report that Goldman was facing a 20bn balance sheet hole if AIG wasn&#8217;t bailed out&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cogblog Blog Archive: "Too Big To Fail!"</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Cogblog Blog Archive: "Too Big To Fail!"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>[...] AIG is &#8220;too big to fail&#8220;.  This made me wonder: What is &quot;too big to fail&quot;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AIG is &#8220;too big to fail&#8220;.  This made me wonder: What is &#8220;too big to fail&#8221;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Moral hazard is oft-bandied term, but when push comes to shove, it is always better to stabilise and recapitalise the system as efficiently as possible, and then go about plugging the systemic holes that led to the problems. 

The real issue is how to avoid repeating past mistakes with future variations of them, and in so so doing, reduce the amount of institutions that are truly TBTF, and their ability to reach such lofty proportions.

Capital cushions need to be stronger for a start, so the recent proposal by US regulators that they want to change accounting rules such that &#039;goodwill&#039; can be counted as capital strikes me as rather odd, ineffective, and oblivious to the problems they actually face. They can blame short sellers all they like, but regulators are the ones to blame here. They are consistently getting it wrong.

Might I suggest they actually address the root cause of the housing meltdown and susequent asset price destruction? Once the downward spiral is halted, so are the constant writedowns.

Ultimately, they have to ask themselves what kind of financial system they want. Do they want one that is actually strong and delivers true services, backed by sufficient capital and appropriate regulation, or one that is prone to over-leverage and instability? We are about to find out in coming months.

As long as they don&#039;t ask the muppets at CNBC for advice, the same goons who scream free market ideology, but are inordinately cheered by Federal Reserve intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moral hazard is oft-bandied term, but when push comes to shove, it is always better to stabilise and recapitalise the system as efficiently as possible, and then go about plugging the systemic holes that led to the problems. </p>
<p>The real issue is how to avoid repeating past mistakes with future variations of them, and in so so doing, reduce the amount of institutions that are truly TBTF, and their ability to reach such lofty proportions.</p>
<p>Capital cushions need to be stronger for a start, so the recent proposal by US regulators that they want to change accounting rules such that &#8216;goodwill&#8217; can be counted as capital strikes me as rather odd, ineffective, and oblivious to the problems they actually face. They can blame short sellers all they like, but regulators are the ones to blame here. They are consistently getting it wrong.</p>
<p>Might I suggest they actually address the root cause of the housing meltdown and susequent asset price destruction? Once the downward spiral is halted, so are the constant writedowns.</p>
<p>Ultimately, they have to ask themselves what kind of financial system they want. Do they want one that is actually strong and delivers true services, backed by sufficient capital and appropriate regulation, or one that is prone to over-leverage and instability? We are about to find out in coming months.</p>
<p>As long as they don&#8217;t ask the muppets at CNBC for advice, the same goons who scream free market ideology, but are inordinately cheered by Federal Reserve intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwoff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/09/aig-too-big-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwoff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1250#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AIG: Too Big to Fail &#124; A Stubborn Mule&#039;s Perspective...&lt;/strong&gt;

A look at why AIG was too big to fail and Lehman Brothers was not....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AIG: Too Big to Fail | A Stubborn Mule&#8217;s Perspective&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A look at why AIG was too big to fail and Lehman Brothers was not&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
