<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on the Guarantee of Australian Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/</link>
	<description>Obstinately objective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:56:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>@Mrs V Fisher: my understanding is that &quot;retail balances&quot; of under $1 million dollars are guaranteed regardless of the interest rate paid on the account. For accounts of over $1 million, it is necessary to pay a fee of 0.7% to have the benefit of the guarantee. Again, this is the case regardless of the interest that the account earns, although you can think of the fee as a reduction in the interest rate. So if you had over $1 million in a cheque account that earned no interest (probably not a good idea!), if you wanted to have the money guaranteed by the Government, you would effectively be earning a negative interest rate of 0.70%. Note also that the $1 million applies to the total across all your accounts with a given bank, so you can&#039;t get around it by opening up a number of accounts with the same back. You could, of course, split it across a number of banks.

Hope that all makes sense. The upshot is that it doesn&#039;t make any difference whether the money is in a cheque account or a savings account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mrs V Fisher: my understanding is that &#8220;retail balances&#8221; of under $1 million dollars are guaranteed regardless of the interest rate paid on the account. For accounts of over $1 million, it is necessary to pay a fee of 0.7% to have the benefit of the guarantee. Again, this is the case regardless of the interest that the account earns, although you can think of the fee as a reduction in the interest rate. So if you had over $1 million in a cheque account that earned no interest (probably not a good idea!), if you wanted to have the money guaranteed by the Government, you would effectively be earning a negative interest rate of 0.70%. Note also that the $1 million applies to the total across all your accounts with a given bank, so you can&#8217;t get around it by opening up a number of accounts with the same back. You could, of course, split it across a number of banks.</p>
<p>Hope that all makes sense. The upshot is that it doesn&#8217;t make any difference whether the money is in a cheque account or a savings account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs V Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs V Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>Could I ask a question please about the Government guarantee on bank accounts in Australian owned Bank? If one had a cheque account (no interest earned) then the Government guarantee protects the money in that account. If one had a savings account that earns interest I understand now that the money earning interest is subject to a reduction in interest rate (.7%) if one elects to keep the Governement guarantee on funds earning interest. One can elect to earn .7% more interest but those funds are not Government guaranteed. Any clarification would be much appreciated. Thanks Val</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could I ask a question please about the Government guarantee on bank accounts in Australian owned Bank? If one had a cheque account (no interest earned) then the Government guarantee protects the money in that account. If one had a savings account that earns interest I understand now that the money earning interest is subject to a reduction in interest rate (.7%) if one elects to keep the Governement guarantee on funds earning interest. One can elect to earn .7% more interest but those funds are not Government guaranteed. Any clarification would be much appreciated. Thanks Val</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australian Bank Guarantee on Wholesale Debt &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Bank Guarantee on Wholesale Debt &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>[...] a post earlier this week, I wrote The Government was right to step in with the guarantee and it has doubtless provided some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post earlier this week, I wrote The Government was right to step in with the guarantee and it has doubtless provided some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banks Covered by the Australian Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Banks Covered by the Australian Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>[...] the shenanigans in parliament earlier this week, the Government has modified their original 12 October media release about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the shenanigans in parliament earlier this week, the Government has modified their original 12 October media release about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australian Banks Get A Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Banks Get A Government Guarantee &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>[...] I have posted an update on the guarantee following a week of parliamentary skirmishing about whether or not the Government consulted Reserve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have posted an update on the guarantee following a week of parliamentary skirmishing about whether or not the Government consulted Reserve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>Henry looked ready to headbutt that prize furball Coonan into tomorrow didn&#039;t he? Aussies cannot be very deserving if this is our political representation. Further, Turnball picked the wrong battle at the wrong time. Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry looked ready to headbutt that prize furball Coonan into tomorrow didn&#8217;t he? Aussies cannot be very deserving if this is our political representation. Further, Turnball picked the wrong battle at the wrong time. Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwoff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/guarantee-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>Kwoff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1388#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Update on the Guarantee of Australian Banks &#124; A Stubborn Mule&#039;s Perspective...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ken Henry gave an impressive performance before the Senate Estimates Committee, but uncertainties remain as to the details of the Government guarantee of Australian banks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update on the Guarantee of Australian Banks | A Stubborn Mule&#8217;s Perspective&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ken Henry gave an impressive performance before the Senate Estimates Committee, but uncertainties remain as to the details of the Government guarantee of Australian banks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
