<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Amazing Shrinking Banks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/</link>
	<description>Obstinately objective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>@BC: I&#039;ve now updated the chart. As you can see, although RBC&#039;s market cap. did fall 44% over the two years, it is still bigger than any of the Australian banks and TD, which fell 37%, is bigger than all but Westpac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BC: I&#8217;ve now updated the chart. As you can see, although RBC&#8217;s market cap. did fall 44% over the two years, it is still bigger than any of the Australian banks and TD, which fell 37%, is bigger than all but Westpac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>@BC: Good point! I&#039;ll add them in. Of course, the Canadian banks have not completely escaped difficulties, as evidenced by TD pulling their business out of Australia a few weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BC: Good point! I&#8217;ll add them in. Of course, the Canadian banks have not completely escaped difficulties, as evidenced by TD pulling their business out of Australia a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a single Canadian Bank here... currently listed as the strongest financial system in the world.

Oversight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a single Canadian Bank here&#8230; currently listed as the strongest financial system in the world.</p>
<p>Oversight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait til Westpac is number 50 in the world again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait til Westpac is number 50 in the world again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>based on your swivel data the bank which has the best relative performance is.....Westpac! It relative share of market cap has increased by 155%. Citi is 3rd worse with a 76% decrease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>based on your swivel data the bank which has the best relative performance is&#8230;..Westpac! It relative share of market cap has increased by 155%. Citi is 3rd worse with a 76% decrease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>it would be interesting to see how they have fared relative to the average market cap - JPM has clearly outperformed while Citi has underperformed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be interesting to see how they have fared relative to the average market cap &#8211; JPM has clearly outperformed while Citi has underperformed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the revised chart which depicts area, not diameter: http://alphaville.ftdata.co.uk/lib/inc/getfile/4214.gif

Bernie really was an amateur compared to these pros</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the revised chart which depicts area, not diameter: <a href="http://alphaville.ftdata.co.uk/lib/inc/getfile/4214.gif">http://alphaville.ftdata.co.uk/lib/inc/getfile/4214.gif</a></p>
<p>Bernie really was an amateur compared to these pros</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CV</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/01/the-amazing-shrinking-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>CV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1595#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>very insightful Mule.  The aggregate market cap from your sample at Jan 2007 was $3.1 trillion.  It is now $1.0 trillion.  $2.1 trillion dollars has vanished in a very short space of time.  At least Bernie Maddof&#039;s ponzi scheme lasted the best part of 20 years and only cost the punters a lazy $50 billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very insightful Mule.  The aggregate market cap from your sample at Jan 2007 was $3.1 trillion.  It is now $1.0 trillion.  $2.1 trillion dollars has vanished in a very short space of time.  At least Bernie Maddof&#8217;s ponzi scheme lasted the best part of 20 years and only cost the punters a lazy $50 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
