<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualizing the Hottest 100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/</link>
	<description>Obstinately objective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:46:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolling Stone vs Triple J &#124; Stubborn Mule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-7845</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolling Stone vs Triple J &#124; Stubborn Mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-7845</guid>
		<description>[...] about Rolling Stone, its readers and the compilers of the list. A while ago I wrote a post about Triple J&#8217;s Hottest 100 of All Time where I noted that the Triple J&#8217;s list was heavily skewed to the 1990s. This chart shows the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Rolling Stone, its readers and the compilers of the list. A while ago I wrote a post about Triple J&#8217;s Hottest 100 of All Time where I noted that the Triple J&#8217;s list was heavily skewed to the 1990s. This chart shows the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nabha</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-4954</link>
		<dc:creator>nabha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-4954</guid>
		<description>i hate nirvana 
i want to die</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate nirvana<br />
i want to die</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>The code for the charts is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/seancarmody/stubborn-mule/tree/45879b845b54549b19090100298f43265a710327/Hottest-100&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in github&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The code for the charts is now <a href="http://github.com/seancarmody/stubborn-mule/tree/45879b845b54549b19090100298f43265a710327/Hottest-100" rel="nofollow">in github</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3918</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3918</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Carlos: &lt;/b&gt;I have been meaning to add this code to my github repository. I will do it as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Carlos: </b>I have been meaning to add this code to my github repository. I will do it as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Ortega</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3917</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Ortega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3917</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I&#039;d like to know if you could post the code you used at R to program the graphics in this post, because I need a graph like the one you did with the names of the songs but I don&#039;t know how to do it.

Thanks so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know if you could post the code you used at R to program the graphics in this post, because I need a graph like the one you did with the names of the songs but I don&#8217;t know how to do it.</p>
<p>Thanks so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Triple J Hottest 100 &#171; Mike Pickard&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>The Triple J Hottest 100 &#171; Mike Pickard&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; not perfect, but pretty darned close; and to @seancarmody for his excellent quantifiable stats. on the final results. Good stuff. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The Triple J Hottest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; not perfect, but pretty darned close; and to @seancarmody for his excellent quantifiable stats. on the final results. Good stuff. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The Triple J Hottest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>For a different sort of demographic, I&#039;ve analysed the Guardian&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/love-old-fashioned/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1000 songs to hear before you die&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a different sort of demographic, I&#8217;ve analysed the Guardian&#8217;s <a href="http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/love-old-fashioned/" rel="nofollow">1000 songs to hear before you die</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love is Old-Fashioned &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Love is Old-Fashioned &#124; A Stubborn Mule's Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>[...] on from my post on Visualizing the Hottest 100, I noticed that the UK&#8217;s Guardian newspaper has published a list of 1000 songs to hear before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on from my post on Visualizing the Hottest 100, I noticed that the UK&#8217;s Guardian newspaper has published a list of 1000 songs to hear before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: get big, little kid</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3411</link>
		<dc:creator>get big, little kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3411</guid>
		<description>[...] Hottest 100 of all time? No, I didn&#8217;t think so.. To jog your memory, here is a neat way of visualising the list. (via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hottest 100 of all time? No, I didn&#8217;t think so.. To jog your memory, here is a neat way of visualising the list. (via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stubbornmule</title>
		<link>http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/07/visualizing-the-hottest-100/comment-page-1/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbornmule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=1835#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>Rob, you make an interesting point about 1997 rating so well in the list. I make the top years as follows:

1997: 11 (of which 2 are Radiohead)
1994: 9 (of which 4 are Jeff Buckley)
1991: 7 (of which 3 are Nirvana)
1995: 5 (of which 1 is Radiohead)
2000: 5

So, once you count for the high ranking acts, 1997 is a standout winner. But, the best single year of music ever? Now that&#039;s a big call. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2006/01/04/BBC-BestMusicYear.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Radio 2 listeners in the UK it was 1967&lt;/a&gt;. Being a bit older than you, I&#039;d probably pick a year in the late 70s or early 80s. But, I&#039;d have to agree that there&#039;s certainly something to explain there about 1997. For those wishing to reflect on that question, here is the list, complete with Hottest 100 rank:

5.   Paranoid Android, Radiohead
9 .  Everlong, Foo Fighters
14. Bittersweet Symphony, The Verve
15. Karma Police, Radiohead
34. Prisoner of Society, The Living End
36. Into My Arms Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds
57. Forty-Six &amp; 2, Tool
58. Around the World, Daft Punk
61. Song 2, Blur
67. Brick, Ben Folds Five
75. Good Riddance (Time of Your Life), Green Day

Meanwhile, here is a mini-poll on &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1794499&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;best year of music ever&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, you make an interesting point about 1997 rating so well in the list. I make the top years as follows:</p>
<p>1997: 11 (of which 2 are Radiohead)<br />
1994: 9 (of which 4 are Jeff Buckley)<br />
1991: 7 (of which 3 are Nirvana)<br />
1995: 5 (of which 1 is Radiohead)<br />
2000: 5</p>
<p>So, once you count for the high ranking acts, 1997 is a standout winner. But, the best single year of music ever? Now that&#8217;s a big call. According to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/story/2006/01/04/BBC-BestMusicYear.html" rel="nofollow">Radio 2 listeners in the UK it was 1967</a>. Being a bit older than you, I&#8217;d probably pick a year in the late 70s or early 80s. But, I&#8217;d have to agree that there&#8217;s certainly something to explain there about 1997. For those wishing to reflect on that question, here is the list, complete with Hottest 100 rank:</p>
<p>5.   Paranoid Android, Radiohead<br />
9 .  Everlong, Foo Fighters<br />
14. Bittersweet Symphony, The Verve<br />
15. Karma Police, Radiohead<br />
34. Prisoner of Society, The Living End<br />
36. Into My Arms Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds<br />
57. Forty-Six &#038; 2, Tool<br />
58. Around the World, Daft Punk<br />
61. Song 2, Blur<br />
67. Brick, Ben Folds Five<br />
75. Good Riddance (Time of Your Life), Green Day</p>
<p>Meanwhile, here is a mini-poll on <a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1794499" rel="nofollow">best year of music ever</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

