Comments on: Fertility Declines Don’t Reverse with Development http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/09/fertility-declines-dont-reverse-with-development/ Obstinately objective Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:22:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Kwoff.com http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/09/fertility-declines-dont-reverse-with-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4155 Kwoff.com Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:46:43 +0000 http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=2191#comment-4155 <strong>Fertility Declines Don’t Reverse with Development...</strong> A Nature article argued that fertility eventually starts to rise with development, but all their analysis is flawed.... Fertility Declines Don’t Reverse with Development…

A Nature article argued that fertility eventually starts to rise with development, but all their analysis is flawed….

]]> By: Is There a Baby Bounce? | A Stubborn Mule's Perspective http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/09/fertility-declines-dont-reverse-with-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4141 Is There a Baby Bounce? | A Stubborn Mule's Perspective Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:21:16 +0000 http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=2191#comment-4141 [...] details can be found in the follow-up post to this one, Fertility Declines Don’t Reverse with Development. Share on Social Bookmarking [...] [...] details can be found in the follow-up post to this one, Fertility Declines Don’t Reverse with Development. Share on Social Bookmarking [...]

]]> By: Danny Yee http://www.stubbornmule.net/2009/09/fertility-declines-dont-reverse-with-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4137 Danny Yee Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:00:24 +0000 http://www.stubbornmule.net/?p=2191#comment-4137 It's depressing that this paper made it into Nature. (Though apparently some large fraction even of Nature and Science papers have fairly elementary statistical problems.) It’s depressing that this paper made it into Nature. (Though apparently some large fraction even of Nature and Science papers have fairly elementary statistical problems.)

]]>